Market developments
How batteries could help Lithuania export more electricity to Poland
Published:
Case period: 2026
An electricity interconnector can serve both trade and system security. How much electricity can be sold to a neighbouring country is therefore not simply a question about the cable or line. LitPol Link between Lithuania and Poland illustrates how supporting stability can relate to allocating more connection capacity to the market.
What has happened and what remains planned
On 8 April 2026, Litgrid announced initial measures and reported daytime export capacity reaching 230 MW. It linked further development partly to frequency stability services from transmission-connected batteries. An auction for isolated-operation reserve was planned for the fourth quarter of 2026.
The announcement distinguishes an implemented step from future service procurement. In preparing this article on 9 September 2026, we found no newer official confirmation that the auction described in that announcement had already taken place. We therefore discuss it as a plan, rather than a completed market outcome or a set of contracts already awarded.
Trading capacity has a security condition
Imagine assessing the connection through two successive questions. First, what system condition must be maintained securely? Then, how much trade can take place within that condition? This logical sequence helps explain why a system service can matter to trading opportunities even when its provider does not itself sell electricity across the international connection.
This does not mean that a battery replaces the interconnector or that electricity exported to Poland must pass through its cells. A battery may supply a function the network needs while the trading flow uses the interconnector. Functional support and the physical energy route need to remain separate in the explanation; otherwise even an attractive diagram can misrepresent how the infrastructure works.
Why the service and connection matter
Litgrid’s announcement refers to transmission-connected storage and particular additional services. That is a narrower description than all batteries. Before connecting a specific project to that opportunity, its connection arrangements, technical compliance and the procurement requirements would need to be understood.
This helps explain why two batteries with identical rated power may have different opportunities. Comparing power and energy capacity alone does not identify where an asset operates within the network or which task it can perform. A useful project presentation connects those questions, rather than treat a general market development as proof that any chosen piece of equipment is eligible.
What this direction means for a prospective participant
The Lithuanian example broadens the discussion about batteries. Their usefulness can concern more than moving energy between expensive and inexpensive hours: it can relate to the wider capabilities of an electricity system. A fuller map of service needs makes the market easier to understand, even when an individual project intends to address only some of them.
Silver BESS Park is under development. We do not describe it as already eligible for this particular auction or as a contributor to the announced capacity increase. Following the operator’s subsequent decisions and requirements is the useful next step. The Scottish case offers another example of stability procurement, but only evidence from Lithuania’s own process can confirm how the Lithuanian plans are implemented.